Western Capital - The Truth

Recently, Western Capital CEO Robert Paisola suggested he be named a co-plaintiff in the case of Callier et al v. Creditwrench. His reasoning? He is a "similarly situated party".

Where Paisola comes up with so much Crappola is beyond me.

This case is not a class action, doesn't qualify as a class action, and will never be a class action.

What Robert Paisola is talking about, but apparently knows nothing about, is the legal principle of permissive joinder.

However, to be joined as a plaintiff in the instant case would require that Western Capital CEO Robert Paisola had a right to relief out of the same occurrance(s) alleged by the current plaintiffs that entitles them to relief. One only need read the complaint to see that Robert Paisola has no colorable claim arising from the actions of Creditwrench that allegedly damaged the named plaintiffs.