- Be sure to read the archives here February 2007
- Be sure to read the archives here March 2007
- Be sure to read the archives here April 2007
- Be sure to read the archives here May 2007
- Be sure to read the archives here June 2007
- Be sure to read the archives here July 2007
- Be sure to read the archives here October 2007
Sunday, October 28, 2007
New federal lawsuit filed against Paisola
As promised, here is a copy of the most recent federal suit filed against Western Capital CEO Robert Paisola.
http://www.geocities.com/e_normis_debtor/tstn.pdf
The latest information I have indicates that Paisola is, once again, attempting to evade service. Accordingly, I will be dispatching my top investigator to Utah to assist in locating him.
http://www.geocities.com/e_normis_debtor/tstn.pdf
The latest information I have indicates that Paisola is, once again, attempting to evade service. Accordingly, I will be dispatching my top investigator to Utah to assist in locating him.
// posted by E. Normis Debtor @ 3:19 PM
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
The latest Federal lawsuit filed against Robert Paisola
Yet another Federal lawsuit filed against the infamous internet con-man, Western Capital CEO Robert Paisola.
For what? You guessed it.....trademark infringement, again.
The Federal lawsuit was filed by Splash Media, owners and operators of The Success Training Network.
I will post more details, including all court documents, shortly.
For what? You guessed it.....trademark infringement, again.
The Federal lawsuit was filed by Splash Media, owners and operators of The Success Training Network.
I will post more details, including all court documents, shortly.
// posted by E. Normis Debtor @ 3:36 PM
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
New updates
Sorry I haven't posted recently.
Just returned from an extended leave and have some new updates that I will be posting shortly.
Just returned from an extended leave and have some new updates that I will be posting shortly.
// posted by E. Normis Debtor @ 7:58 PM
Sunday, July 1, 2007
More babble eminating from the pie whole of Paisola
Recently, Western Capital CEO Robert Paisola suggested he be named a co-plaintiff in the case of Callier et al v. Creditwrench. His reasoning? He is a "similarly situated party".
Where Paisola comes up with so much Crappola is beyond me.
This case is not a class action, doesn't qualify as a class action, and will never be a class action.
What Robert Paisola is talking about, but apparently knows nothing about, is the legal principle of permissive joinder.
However, to be joined as a plaintiff in the instant case would require that Western Capital CEO Robert Paisola had a right to relief out of the same occurrance(s) alleged by the current plaintiffs that entitles them to relief. One only need read the complaint to see that Robert Paisola has no colorable claim arising from the actions of Creditwrench that allegedly damaged the named plaintiffs.
Where Paisola comes up with so much Crappola is beyond me.
This case is not a class action, doesn't qualify as a class action, and will never be a class action.
What Robert Paisola is talking about, but apparently knows nothing about, is the legal principle of permissive joinder.
However, to be joined as a plaintiff in the instant case would require that Western Capital CEO Robert Paisola had a right to relief out of the same occurrance(s) alleged by the current plaintiffs that entitles them to relief. One only need read the complaint to see that Robert Paisola has no colorable claim arising from the actions of Creditwrench that allegedly damaged the named plaintiffs.
// posted by E. Normis Debtor @ 12:57 PM
Sunday, June 17, 2007
More false and misleading information from America's most notorious con-man Robert Paisola
More later....watching the Open :)
// posted by E. Normis Debtor @ 8:40 AM
Wednesday, June 13, 2007
Robert Paisola does it again
Giving bad advice to consumers seems to be Western Capital CEO Robert Paisola's purpose in life. He continually proves, time and time again, that he has absolutely no knowledge of collection laws. In fact, everytime he posts anything he proves it again.
Here's today's example:
A consumer poses the following to Robert Paisola:
I had a student loan in the 1970's but due to lack of working full time I could never pay off
Original amount was $3500.
NY State HESC got a judgment in Albany County Court in 1985 and amounts accrued over the years to $14000.
I never made any payments, they seized some tax refunds when I had them.
In NY State a judgment runs for 20 years so my question is this judgment ran out to collect on in 2005 so can they still persue me for it?
Robert Paisola responds with this idiotic advice:
If you are telling me that the State got a judgment against you and the laws in your state indicate the the judgment is good for 20 years (Hell, that is a long time...) then I would imagine that the judgment expired.
Wrong again Bobby boy!
Judgments on student loans which were guaranteed by the US Government never expire.
You see, there is this little thing called a federal preemption of state law.
Though a state court may have awarded the judgment, the federal statute of limitations for judgments on a student loan preempts the state's staute of limitations.
US Code, Title 20, Section 1091a(a) In general
(1) It is the purpose of this subsection to ensure that obligations to repay loans and grant overpayments are enforced without regard to any Federal or State statutory, regulatory, or administrative limitation on the period within which debts may be enforced.
(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of statute, regulation, or administrative limitation, no limitation shall terminate the period within which suit may be filed, a judgment may be enforced, or an offset, garnishment, or other action
Once again, Western Capital CEO Robert Paisola provides false and misleading information to unwary consumers.
Here's today's example:
A consumer poses the following to Robert Paisola:
I had a student loan in the 1970's but due to lack of working full time I could never pay off
Original amount was $3500.
NY State HESC got a judgment in Albany County Court in 1985 and amounts accrued over the years to $14000.
I never made any payments, they seized some tax refunds when I had them.
In NY State a judgment runs for 20 years so my question is this judgment ran out to collect on in 2005 so can they still persue me for it?
Robert Paisola responds with this idiotic advice:
If you are telling me that the State got a judgment against you and the laws in your state indicate the the judgment is good for 20 years (Hell, that is a long time...) then I would imagine that the judgment expired.
Wrong again Bobby boy!
Judgments on student loans which were guaranteed by the US Government never expire.
You see, there is this little thing called a federal preemption of state law.
Though a state court may have awarded the judgment, the federal statute of limitations for judgments on a student loan preempts the state's staute of limitations.
US Code, Title 20, Section 1091a(a) In general
(1) It is the purpose of this subsection to ensure that obligations to repay loans and grant overpayments are enforced without regard to any Federal or State statutory, regulatory, or administrative limitation on the period within which debts may be enforced.
(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of statute, regulation, or administrative limitation, no limitation shall terminate the period within which suit may be filed, a judgment may be enforced, or an offset, garnishment, or other action
Once again, Western Capital CEO Robert Paisola provides false and misleading information to unwary consumers.
// posted by E. Normis Debtor @ 12:39 PM
Monday, June 11, 2007
Patti Pacifico
I read an article today authored by Creditwrench CEO Billie Bauer that referred to Patti Pacifico, an admitted business associate of Western Capital CEO Robert Paisola, as a "journalistic prostitute."
Now I don't know whether Patti Pacifico is a "journalistic prostitute" or not, because frankly I'm not sure what a "journalistic prostitute" is.
What I do know is that Patti Pacifico has removed her Robert Paisola page from her website. And, all of the previous articles claimed to be authored by Robert Paisola have been removed as well.
A coincidence, or just a smart move by Patti Pacifico.
You see, I researched each and every one of the articles on her site that Robert Paisola took credit for as author. And, every one of them contained plagiarized material. Then I made every effort to contact the actual authors of the plagiarized articles.
Posting, or publishing in any form, copyrighted material without the real authors permission, can expose one financially if the author chooses to pursue a private right of action against the publisher.
Now I don't know whether Patti Pacifico is a "journalistic prostitute" or not, because frankly I'm not sure what a "journalistic prostitute" is.
What I do know is that Patti Pacifico has removed her Robert Paisola page from her website. And, all of the previous articles claimed to be authored by Robert Paisola have been removed as well.
A coincidence, or just a smart move by Patti Pacifico.
You see, I researched each and every one of the articles on her site that Robert Paisola took credit for as author. And, every one of them contained plagiarized material. Then I made every effort to contact the actual authors of the plagiarized articles.
Posting, or publishing in any form, copyrighted material without the real authors permission, can expose one financially if the author chooses to pursue a private right of action against the publisher.
// posted by E. Normis Debtor @ 4:18 PM
